| FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
November 28, 2007
Army-Operated Child Care Program’s Refusal to Administer Emergency
Epilepsy Medication Discriminates Based on Disability
Protection & Advocacy Files Civil Rights Lawsuit Seeking to Ensure Safe Child
Care for 3-Year-Old Boy, Whose Father is about to be Deployed to Afghanistan
Contact:
Heidi Schissler Lanham
502-564-2967
Frankfort, KY -- Today, Protection and Advocacy, an
independent, federally-mandated advocacy agency for people with disabilities, filed a
lawsuit against the U.S. Army for refusing to provide emergency treatment to a 3-yearold
boy with epilepsy in an Army-operated child care program at Fort Campbell. The
boy’s physician prescribed the medication--to be administered rectally by his parents
or other caregivers--in the event he experiences prolonged seizures, which can cause
brain injury or death if not promptly treated.
Protection and Advocacy claims in its lawsuit that, under federal law prohibiting
discrimination against persons with disabilities, the Army-operated child care program
has an obligation to modify its policy against administering this medication. This
policy change is necessary to afford the boy an equal opportunity to participate in the
program. The boy’s father, Sergeant First Class Jerry Rutherford, will be deployed to
Afghanistan early next year, underscoring the need for the family to secure safe child
care services.
The medication, diazepam rectal gel (the trade name is Diastat AcuDial), is the
standard out-of-hospital, FDA-approved medication for prolonged seizures and may be
given by caregivers such as parents, day care workers and school personnel who do
not have medical training. (For more information on epilepsy and this medication, see
the Background section attached.)
The boy’s parents attempted to enroll their son in day care at Fort Campbell in 2006
so that Mrs. Rutherford could take time away from home to complete a bachelor’s
degree in nuclear medicine. “Day care for my son is necessary for me to finish my
schooling,” Mrs. Rutherford said. She added, “I have repeatedly attempted to provide
the day care program information from my son’s doctor authorizing them to
administer the medication and have myself attempted to inform them that it is easy
and safe to use, but they are unwilling to provide this critical care for my son.”
Fort Campbell’s child development center program for children with disabilities (which
operates the child care program) claims that it will not comply with the parents’
request because its staff is not permitted to administer any medication rectally.
However, day care staff currently is required to administer other comparable drugs
and treatments to children with other serious conditions that require immediate
intervention. Children with epilepsy are particularly susceptible to prolonged seizures
that can cause serious brain injury or death if not treated very promptly, yet the
Army’s only plan for treatment of the child’s seizures was to call 911.
"When a patient begins to have prolonged or recurrent seizures outside of their normal
patterns, it's a medical emergency that needs to be treated immediately," said James
W. Wheless, M.D., professor and chief of pediatric neurology at the University of
Tennessee Health Sciences Center. As Dr. Wheless noted in EpilepsyUSA magazine,
"In the United States, the amount of time that typically elapses between the onset of a
seizure and a patient receiving treatment at a hospital can exceed one hour. That's too
long for this type of emergency. Diastat AcuDial is a safe, effective treatment, which is
a significant patient advantage."
The Protection and Advocacy lawsuit for the 3-year-old boy is based on a federal civil
rights law, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which prohibits federallyoperated
organizations and those that receive Federal financial assistance from
discriminating against qualified individuals based on their disability. The law applies
to the day care center at Fort Campbell because it is operated by a federal agency and
receives federal funds.
“We believe this is a strong case,” said Protection and Advocacy legal director Heidi
Schissler Lanham. “This little boy is being denied equal access to day care because of
his epilepsy. He most certainly would be in the day care if he did not require
accommodations for his disability.” A similar lawsuit, against a national day care
chain regarding its refusal to administer this medication to enrolled children, is
currently pending in California. Although state law does not apply to the Fort
Campbell’s day care program, under Kentucky Law (Kentucky Revised Statutes
158.838(1)(b)), the state’s schools have been required since 2005 to administer Diastat
AcuDial to students with epilepsy who require it. A variety of school staff such as
teachers aides are authorized to administer the medication.
Debbie McGrath, executive director of the Epilepsy Foundation of Kentuckiana stated:“The Foundation strongly promotes the use of Diastat when medically necessary and
prescribed to patients who experience seizures that do not stop on their own, or
seizures that cluster, both of which can cause damage to the brain and are potentially
life-threatening.”
Mrs. Rutherford said, “All I really want is for Fort Campbell to agree to give my son the
medicine he needs if he has a seizure that lasts longer than five minutes. It’s not
difficult to do and would allow him to enroll in day care, just like the other Fort Campbell children."
|